# **Forensic Analysis of Terminal Emulation Anomalies and Shell Syntax Pathologies Resulting from Binary Data Ingestion**
## **1\. Introduction: The Convergence of Display and Logic Failures**
The interaction between binary data streams, terminal emulators, and shell command interpreters constitutes one of the most fragile yet fundamental aspects of Unix-like operating systems. This report provides an exhaustive forensic analysis of a scenario where a user encounters Bash errors—specifically "syntax error near unexpected token"—accompanied by the display of binary garbage and the failure of command substitutions. The investigation reveals that this is not merely a syntactic issue within a script or a simple user error, but a complex cascading failure involving the Terminal Line Discipline, ANSI escape sequence injection, and the shell’s lexical analysis mechanisms.
The phenomenon observed—where a terminal session degrades into unintelligible characters followed by inexplicable syntax errors—is a classic manifestation of the "in-band signaling" problem inherent in the design of standard input/output (I/O) streams. When a user or a script inadvertently directs non-textual binary data to the terminal's standard output (stdout), the terminal emulator does not passively display the data. Instead, it attempts to interpret the raw bytes as control instructions. This interpretation triggers a sequence of state changes that corrupt the display (causing "garbage") and, critically, causes the terminal to transmit data back to the host system via Device Attribute (DA) responses.
This report posits that the reported Bash syntax errors are a direct consequence of this feedback loop. The shell, interpreting the terminal's auto-generated response as user input, fails to parse the sequence, resulting in the reported syntax errors. The analysis will dissect the architecture of terminal emulation, the pathology of the Bash parser under fuzzing conditions, the mechanics of command substitution failures, and the precise recovery methodologies required to restore system integrity. Through this detailed examination, we aim to provide a definitive root cause analysis and a robust set of solutions for preventing recurrence.
## **2\. The Architecture of Terminal Emulation and In-Band Signaling**
To fully grasp the mechanism of failure, one must first deconstruct the architecture of the Unix terminal subsystem. The error manifested in the user's log—bash: command substitution: syntax error near unexpected token—is a symptom of a breakdown in the communication pipeline between the kernel, the terminal emulator, and the shell.
### **2.1 The Evolution from Teletypes to Pseudo-Terminals (PTYs)**
The behavior of modern terminal emulators (like xterm, GNOME Terminal, or Alacritty) is rooted in the physical hardware of the mid-20th century, specifically Teletype (TTY) machines. These devices communicated with mainframes via serial lines, sending and receiving streams of bytes. Crucially, the same channel carried both the text to be printed and the control signals to manage the hardware (e.g., ring the bell, move the carriage return, feed a new line).1
In modern Linux and Unix environments, this hardware is virtualized through Pseudo-Terminals (PTYs). A PTY acts as a bidirectional pipe with specific semantics. It consists of two ends:
1. **The Master Side:** Controlled by the terminal emulator application. It receives characters from the application to display on the screen and sends keystrokes from the user to the slave side.
2. **The Slave Side:** Consumed by the shell (Bash, Zsh) or other command-line interface (CLI) programs. To the shell, the slave side appears indistinguishable from a physical serial port or console.2
This virtualization preserves the legacy design of in-band signaling. The standard output (stdout) of a command is treated as a continuous stream of bytes. Text files strictly adhere to character encodings like ASCII or UTF-8, which reserve specific byte ranges for printable characters. Binary files, however, utilize the full spectrum of 256 possible byte values (![][image1] to ![][image2]). When these bytes are sent to the terminal—for example, via an inadvertent cat of a binary file or an improper command substitution—they bypass the shell's logic and are processed directly by the terminal emulator's rendering engine.1
### **2.2 The Kernel Line Discipline (N\_TTY)**
Between the PTY master and slave sits the kernel’s TTY driver, which implements a "Line Discipline" (ldisc), typically N\_TTY. This software layer is responsible for the standard processing of input and output. It handles features that users take for granted, such as:
* **Echoing:** Displaying characters as they are typed.
* **Canonical Processing:** Buffering input until a newline is received, allowing for backspace editing.
* **Signal Generation:** Converting specific control characters (like Ctrl+C or 0x03) into POSIX signals (SIGINT) sent to the foreground process.
When binary data is piped through this layer, the distinction between "data" and "control" blurs. The line discipline may interpret random binary bytes as control characters. For instance, a byte 0x03 inside a binary file, if echoed back to the input queue, could interrupt the running process. More critically, the line discipline passes the raw binary stream to the terminal emulator, which maintains a complex state machine driven by these bytes.2
### **2.3 ANSI Escape Sequences and the State Machine**
Terminal emulators maintain a persistent state that includes cursor position, text color, active character sets, and input modes. This state is manipulated via escape sequences, primarily defined by the ECMA-48 standard and legacy VT100 specifications. An escape sequence typically begins with the Escape character (![][image3] or 0x1B), often followed by a bracket \`
#### **2.3.2 Device Attribute Queries (DA)**
This is the most critical vector for the syntax errors observed. The sequence \`ESC
If the shell is active and waiting for a prompt, or if the script is currently executing a command that reads from stdin, it receives this sequence.
* **The Interpretation:** Bash reads this input. The Escape character begins a sequence, but if not handled by the Readline library correctly (or if the shell is in a specific mode), the subsequent characters are treated as literals or distinct tokens.
* **The Crash:** The character ; is a command separator in Bash. The c is a literal. The 2 is a literal number. Crucially, depending on the specific response string (e.g., some terminals return strings containing parentheses or other metacharacters), the shell parser encounters tokens it does not expect in the current context.
This phenomenon explains the dual symptoms: the visual corruption (due to charset switching via 0x0E) and the syntax error (due to the shell trying to parse the terminal's auto-reply generated by ESC \[ c).4
## **3\. Detailed Pathology of Bash Syntax Errors**
The user's query highlights a specific error message: bash: command substitution: syntax error near unexpected token. This section analyzes the linguistic processing of the Bourne Again Shell (Bash) to explain why this specific error arises during binary data ingestion.
### **3.1 The Bash Parser and Tokenization**
Bash processes input in a strictly defined sequence of stages: quoting, tokenization (lexical analysis), expansion, and parsing. The parser expects a stream of tokens adhering to a strict grammar defined (historically) by Yacc/Bison rules.
When command substitution is employed—using the syntax $(command) or the legacy backticks \`command\`—Bash spawns a subshell or creates a new execution context to run the enclosed command. It captures the command's standard output and replaces the substitution string with that output in the parent command's argument list.5
#### **3.1.1 The Role of Newlines and Line Counting**
A critical factor in processing binary files is the presence—or total lack—of newline characters (0x0A). Snippet 1 raises the question of why cating a binary file causes "high line numbers" in error reports.
Bash scripts and text processing utilities like sed, awk, and grep operate on a line-by-line basis. A "line" is defined strictly as a sequence of bytes terminated by 0x0A. In a binary file, 0x0A occurs purely by chance, statistically roughly once every 256 bytes in a uniform random distribution. However, in structured binary formats (like compressed archives, JPEGs, or executables), 0x0A might not appear for megabytes of data.
If a binary file is passed to Bash for execution (e.g., source binary\_file or $(cat binary\_file)), the shell sees one incredibly long line. When a syntax error inevitably occurs (because the binary data is not valid shell code), the error message reports the line number where the parser failed. Since the entire multi-megabyte stream is interpreted as "Line 1," the error report often confusingly refers to the start of the file or a very high character offset disguised as a line number issue.1 Conversely, if the binary happens to contain many 0x0A bytes, the line counter increments rapidly, leading to errors on "line 2453" of a file that the user believes is small or irrelevant.
### **3.2 Command Substitution Failure Modes**
The error syntax error near unexpected token implies that the parser encountered a grammatical token (like (, ), |, &, fi, or done) in a position where the shell grammar forbids it.
#### **Case A: Unquoted Command Substitution**
Consider the command:
Bash
var=$(cat binary\_file)
If binary\_file contains unquoted whitespace or shell metacharacters, the result of the expansion undergoes **Word Splitting** and **Filename Expansion** (globbing).6
If the binary file contains the byte 0x28 ((), and the expansion is used in a context like:
Bash
echo $(cat binary\_file)
The shell attempts to expand the content. If the binary content happens to form a sequence that looks like a subshell start ( or a function definition, the parser state machine may become desynchronized. For example, if the binary expansion inserts an opening parenthesis without a closing one, or places it immediately after a function name, the parser will flag it.
#### **Case B: The "Unexpected Token" Injection**
Referring back to the feedback loop mechanism 4, if the binary stream triggers a terminal response \`^ and.8
### **3.3 The Role of Carriage Returns (DOS Line Endings)**
A ubiquitous cause of "syntax error near unexpected token," particularly involving tokens like do, done, fi, or then, is the presence of Carriage Return characters (\\r or 0x0D) from Windows/DOS-formatted files.9
In Unix, the line terminator is Line Feed (LF, \\n). In DOS/Windows, it is Carriage Return \+ Line Feed (CRLF, \\r\\n). When Bash reads a script with CRLF endings:
1. A line reading if \[ condition \]; then\<CR\>\<LF\>
2. Is parsed as if \[ condition \]; then\<CR\>.
3. The token is then\<CR\>, not then.
4. Bash looks for the then keyword to match the if statement. It does not find it (because then\\r is distinct from then).
5. It continues parsing until it finds fi (or else).
6. Since it never saw the opening then, it considers the fi to be unexpected and out of place.
This manifests as: syntax error near unexpected token 'fi' or 'done'.10
In the context of the user's query about binary garbage, \\r is a common byte in binary files. If a binary file is sourced or substituted, these \\r bytes will corrupt token recognition just as they do in DOS-formatted text scripts. This creates a "false positive" scenario where the error looks like a script logic issue but is actually an encoding mismatch caused by the binary data ingestion.
### **3.4 Table: Comparison of Shell Syntax Error Vectors**
The following table summarizes the different vectors by which binary data induces syntax errors in Bash.
| Error Type | Trigger Mechanism | Role of Binary Data | Typical Error Message |
| :---- | :---- | :---- | :---- |
| **Injection Error** | Device Attribute (DA) Response | Contains \`ESC, we can reconstruct the exact sequence of events that leads to the user's screenshot (implied) and logs. This reconstruction assumes a standard Linux environment using Bash and a VT100-compatible terminal emulator (like xterm, Konsole, or iTerm2). | |
### **4.1 The Trigger Event**
The user executes a command that dumps binary data to stdout. Common culprits include:
1. cat /bin/ls (viewing an executable file).
2. cat image.png (viewing an image file).
3. curl http://site.com/binary (fetching a binary resource without the \-o flag to save to disk).
4. grep "string" binary\_file (without \-a or implying binary context, causing grep to output the matching binary line).
### **4.2 The Display Phase (Visual Corruption)**
As the bytes flood the terminal, the Line Discipline passes them to the emulator.
1. **Non-Printable Characters:** Bytes like 0x07 (Bell) cause the terminal to beep or flash. Bytes 0x00-0x1F cause erratic cursor movements (0x08 Backspace, 0x09 Tab), overwriting text on the screen.
2. **Charset Locking:** The stream contains 0x0E (Shift Out). The terminal switches to the G1 character set (Graphics). Subsequent output (even the shell prompt itself) is rendered using this set. The letter 'a' might appear as a checkerboard; 'x' might be a vertical bar. This is the "binary garbage" described in the query.2 The user sees a screen full of gibberish, and even when the command stops, typing commands yields only more gibberish.
### **4.3 The Injection Phase (Logical Corruption)**
Hidden within the binary stream is the sequence 0x1B 0x5B 0x63 (\`ESC
## **5\. Deep Dive: Command Substitution Vulnerabilities**
The user query specifically mentions "Command Substitution Failures". This warrants a dedicated analysis of how $(...) handles binary data compared to plain execution.
### **5.1 Null Byte Truncation and Variable Handling**
Bash variables are effectively C strings, which are null-terminated. However, Bash is capable of holding binary data in variables to an extent, but the read builtin and command substitution mechanisms have limitations with the Null Byte (0x00).1
Most standard Unix text tools (sed, grep, awk) are designed to process text streams. When command substitution runs var=$(cat binary), the shell creates a pipe. The cat process writes to the write-end of the pipe. The shell reads from the read-end.
1. **Trailing Newlines:** Command substitution automatically strips trailing newlines.6 If the binary file ends with 0x0A, that byte is removed. This corruption alters the binary integrity, making the variable content essentially different from the file content.
2. **Null Bytes:** While modern Bash handles null bytes better than older shells, passing variables containing null bytes as arguments to other commands (execve) often fails because the kernel treats the argument string as terminated at the first null byte. Bash will typically emit a warning: command substitution: ignored null byte in input. This warning itself is a form of error that clutters the logs.
### **5.2 Argument List Too Long**
Snippet 13 and 13 discuss the limitation of expanding file lists. Similarly, if $(cat binary\_file) expands to a string larger than ARG\_MAX (system limit on argument size), the execution will fail with "Argument list too long". This is relevant if the "garbage" error is followed by a crash. Binary files can be massive. Trying to load a 10MB binary into a command line variable echo $(cat binary) will inevitably exhaust the argument buffer space. The ARG\_MAX limit on Linux is typically around 2MB, meaning any binary larger than this will cause a hard failure if passed as an argument.
### **5.3 Quoting and Globbing Risks**
Snippet 6 emphasizes the importance of quoting: DIRNAME="$(dirname "$FILE")". If the binary data is assigned to a variable without quotes:
Bash
data=$(cat binary)
process $data
The shell performs **Word Splitting** on $data. Every space (0x20), tab (0x09), and newline (0x0A) in the binary file becomes a delimiter. The binary file is shattered into thousands of arguments.
Next, **Pathname Expansion** (Globbing) occurs. If the binary contains \*, ?, or \`
## **6\. Remediation and Recovery Strategies**
Recovering from a terminal corrupted by binary data requires specific knowledge of termios and escape sequences. The report identifies three tiers of recovery, ranging from simple resets to advanced state manipulation.
### **6.1 Tier 1: The "Blind" Reset**
When the terminal charset is switched (G1 set), typed characters appear as gibberish. The user cannot see what they are typing. This psychological barrier often prevents effective recovery. The command reset 2 is the standard fix. It performs a comprehensive re-initialization:
1. Initializes the terminal emulator (sends initialization string rs1/rs2 from the terminfo database).
2. Resets tab stops to defaults (every 8 spaces).
3. Sets the character set back to US-ASCII (G0).
4. Flushes dirty buffers in the line discipline.
**Procedure:** Since the user cannot see the characters, they must type reset\<Enter\> blindly. If the prompt is currently containing garbage text, it is recommended to press Ctrl+C first to clear the current line.15
### **6.2 Tier 2: stty sane**
If reset is unavailable or too slow (it often waits for terminal replies which might be blocked), stty sane is the reliable fallback.2 stty manipulates the kernel Line Discipline directly. The sane argument resets the discipline to reasonable defaults:
* Enables echo (so users can see typing).
* Enables icanon (canonical line processing, enabling backspace).
* Enables icrnl (map Carriage Return to Newline on input).
* Restores special characters (Ctrl+C for interrupt, Ctrl+Z for suspend).
This command fixes the interpretation of input but might not fix the visual rendering (character sets) of the terminal emulator itself. It ensures that Enter works and commands are accepted.3
### **6.3 Tier 3: The Echo Escape Sequence**
To specifically fix the "Garbage Text" (Shift-In/Shift-Out issue) without a full reset, one can force the terminal back to the standard charset.
The command is:
Bash
echo \-e "\\017"
Or entering Ctrl+V, Ctrl+O (Shift-In) on the command line. Snippet 3 suggests echo \<ctrl-v\>\<esc\>c\<enter\>, which sends the "Full Reset" (RIS) escape sequence to the terminal. This is a hard reset for the emulator state, equivalent to power-cycling a physical terminal. It clears the screen, resets cursor position, and restores all defaults.
### **6.4 Fixing the Scripts (Root Cause Prevention)**
To prevent the "syntax error" and "command substitution" failures in the future, scripts must be hardened against binary data:
1. **Never cat binary files directly:** Use tools designed for binary inspection. od (octal dump), hexdump, xxd, or cat \-v.9 cat \-v escapes non-printing characters (e.g., displaying \`^ This is the single most effective defense against accidental shell expansion errors.
2. **Sanitize Input:** If a script reads from a file that might be binary, filter it.
Bash
clean\_data=$(cat file | tr \-cd '\\11\\12\\15\\40-\\176')
This command removes all bytes except printable ASCII and standard whitespace.
3. **Handle Line Endings:** Run dos2unix on scripts or input files to remove carriage returns \\r that cause parser failures.10 This eliminates the "syntax error near done" class of bugs.
### **6.5 Table: Comparison of Recovery Commands**
| Command | Mechanism | Target Layer | Effect | Pros | Cons |
| :---- | :---- | :---- | :---- | :---- | :---- |
| reset | Reads terminfo, sends initialization strings. | Terminal Emulator | Full Re-initialization | Most complete fix. | Slow; can hang if I/O is blocked. |
| stty sane | ioctl calls to TTY driver. | Kernel Line Discipline | Restores Input Processing | Instant; fixes Enter/Backspace key mapping. | Does not fix "garbage" charset (G1/G0) display. |
| echo \-e "\\017" | Sends Shift-In (^O). | Terminal Charset | Restores ASCII | Fixes "garbage" text immediately. | Does not fix broken input modes or tabs. |
| tput reset | Uses ncurses to send reset string. | Terminal Emulator | Re-initialization | Faster than reset command. | Requires ncurses installed. |
## **7\. Comprehensive Analysis of Provided Research Material**
The research snippets provided 5 offer a fragmented but consistent picture of the problem space. By synthesizing these disjointed data points, we can reinforce our analysis with specific evidence.
### **7.1 Syntax Error Clusters**
* 5 & 5: These snippets highlight the "syntax error near unexpected token |". This confirms that pipes or special characters inside substitution $(...) are sensitive to parsing errors if not quoted or if the content contains binary noise that alters the context (e.g., an unclosed quote).
* 7 & 7: "syntax error near unexpected token (". This specific token is highly indicative of the terminal injection theory. The response ^\[\[?1;2c contains a semicolon and numbers, but depending on the exact terminal (e.g., some report ^\[\[\>1;2;0c), the characters inject syntactical chaos.
* 10: Explicitly links "syntax error near unexpected token 'done'" to DOS line endings. This is a crucial "false positive" to rule out. If the user's binary garbage includes 0x0D, the shell acts exactly as it does with DOS scripts.
### **7.2 The Terminal Injection Evidence**
* 4 & 4: These are the most valuable snippets for root cause analysis. They explicitly describe the scenario: file \-m (binary output) \-\> "Tons of binary gibberish" \-\> "Warning:... invalid file" \-\> ^ asks: \*"how does catting a binary file lead to crap being typed into my prompt?"\* The answer provided confirms the \\eZ\` (Identify Terminal) sequence. The terminal replies, and the reply is executed. This is the definitive explanation for the "Bash Error" component of the user's query.
### **7.3 Command Substitution Mechanics**
* 8: A user asks about file \<(printf...) causing syntax errors. This shows that even *Process Substitution* \<(...) is susceptible to syntax errors if the underlying command produces output that confuses the parser or if the file descriptor handling is disrupted.
* 17: Discusses syntax errors due to unquoted paths with spaces (e.g., Program Files (x86)). While this is a text error, it parallels the binary error: unquoted special characters (( in x86) break the parser. In binary files, these characters appear randomly and frequently.
### **7.4 The cat Behavior**
* 1: These snippets reinforce that cat is a "dumb" utility. It performs no analysis; it just moves bytes from source to destination. The "high line numbers" mentioned in queries like 6 or 18 are due to the absence of newlines in binary streams. When Bash parses a 1GB binary file as one line, an error at byte 500MB is reported as "line 1". This explains why error logs from binary ingestion are often cryptic regarding location.
## **8\. Advanced Theoretical Implications**
### **8.1 Security: The Terminal Escape Injection Attack**
This phenomenon is not just a nuisance; it is a security vulnerability known as **Terminal Escape Injection**. If an attacker can trick a user into cat-ing a file (e.g., "Check this log file for errors"), they can embed escape sequences that:
1. **Hide Input:** Change text color to the background color, effectively masking the user's subsequent commands.
2. **Inject Commands:** Use the DA response mechanism or programmable function keys (on supported terminals) to inject arbitrary commands.
3. **Remap Keys:** In programmable terminals, sequences can remap the Enter key to execute rm \-rf / before sending the carriage return.
This is why modern ls implementations default to escaping control characters when writing to a TTY, and why cat should be used with extreme caution on untrusted files. The cat \-v flag acts as a sanitizer, stripping the executable potential from these sequences.
### **8.2 The Fragility of In-Band Signaling**
The root architectural flaw is **In-Band Signaling**. The data channel (text to display) and the control channel (commands to the terminal) share the same stream (stdout). This dates back to teleprinters where distinct cables for control were too expensive or impossible. In the modern era, this legacy design persists. A robust system would separate display data from control metadata, preventing binary data from ever being interpreted as control instructions. However, the ubiquity of ANSI/VT100 compatibility makes this architectural shift unlikely in the near future.
### **8.3 Character Encoding Ambiguities**
Binary data often violates UTF-8 validation rules. When a terminal set to UTF-8 receives invalid byte sequences (e.g., 0xFF, 0xC0), it uses replacement characters () or drops bytes entirely. This unpredictable filtering can alter the effective escape sequences received by the parser, making the exact syntax error non-deterministic. A file might cause an error on xterm but not on iTerm2 due to different error-handling logic for invalid UTF-8 sequences. This variability makes debugging binary-induced shell errors particularly frustrating for users working across different environments.
## **9\. Conclusion**
The "Bash errors, binary garbage, and command substitution failures" reported by the user are a triad of symptoms resulting from a single root cause: **the unsafe transmission of raw binary data to a terminal emulator.**
1. **Binary Garbage:** Caused by the terminal interpreting random bytes as control sequences, specifically Shift-Out (0x0E) which corrupts the character set mapping.
2. **Bash Syntax Errors:** Caused by the terminal interpreting random bytes as a "Send Device Attributes" query (ESC \[ c) and injecting the response (^\[\[?1;2c) into the shell's standard input. The shell blindly attempts to parse this injected string as a command, failing on the special characters.
3. **Command Substitution Failure:** Exacerbated by the presence of null bytes, lack of newlines (causing buffer/argument limits), and the expansion of binary metacharacters into file globs.
**Solution:**
* **Immediate:** Execute reset or stty sane to restore the terminal state.
* **Procedural:** Never output binary data to the terminal. Use cat \-v to inspect, base64 to transfer, or od/hexdump to analyze.
* **Scripting:** Always quote variables ("$var") and sanitize inputs before processing to prevent the shell from choking on injected garbage.
This ecosystem of errors serves as a stark reminder of the Unix philosophy's double-edged sword: the power of universal text streams comes with the peril of interpreting everything as a stream, even when it isn't. The "everything is a file" abstraction breaks down when the file contains the control codes that govern the abstraction itself.
#### **Works cited**
1. Why (and how) did using cat on binary files mess up the terminal?, accessed January 26, 2026, [https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/119480/why-and-how-did-using-cat-on-binary-files-mess-up-the-terminal](https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/119480/why-and-how-did-using-cat-on-binary-files-mess-up-the-terminal)
2. stty, tty, clear & reset – www.lostpenguin.net, accessed January 26, 2026, [http://www.lostpenguin.net/index.php/stty-tty-clear-reset/](http://www.lostpenguin.net/index.php/stty-tty-clear-reset/)
3. How to fix a terminal after a binary file has been dumped inside it? \[duplicate\], accessed January 26, 2026, [https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/50752/how-to-fix-a-terminal-after-a-binary-file-has-been-dumped-inside-it](https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/50752/how-to-fix-a-terminal-after-a-binary-file-has-been-dumped-inside-it)
4. How does catting binary data lead to text being sent to stdin of the terminal I'm using?, accessed January 26, 2026, [https://www.reddit.com/r/commandline/comments/1et3ed/how\_does\_catting\_binary\_data\_lead\_to\_text\_being/](https://www.reddit.com/r/commandline/comments/1et3ed/how_does_catting_binary_data_lead_to_text_being/)
5. bash: command substitution: syntax error near unexpected token |' \- Stack Overflow, accessed January 26, 2026, [https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43667509/bash-command-substitution-syntax-error-near-unexpected-token](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/43667509/bash-command-substitution-syntax-error-near-unexpected-token)
6. Quoting within $(command substitution) in Bash \- Unix & Linux Stack Exchange, accessed January 26, 2026, [https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/118433/quoting-within-command-substitution-in-bash](https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/118433/quoting-within-command-substitution-in-bash)
7. command substitution: line 72: syntax error near unexpected token \`(' \- Stack Overflow, accessed January 26, 2026, [https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68035754/command-substitution-line-72-syntax-error-near-unexpected-token](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/68035754/command-substitution-line-72-syntax-error-near-unexpected-token)
8. "bash: syntax error near unexpected token \`('" error with process substitution, accessed January 26, 2026, [https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/669655/bash-syntax-error-near-unexpected-token-error-with-process-substitution](https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/669655/bash-syntax-error-near-unexpected-token-error-with-process-substitution)
9. Are shell scripts sensitive to encoding and line endings? \- Stack Overflow, accessed January 26, 2026, [https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39527571/are-shell-scripts-sensitive-to-encoding-and-line-endings](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/39527571/are-shell-scripts-sensitive-to-encoding-and-line-endings)
10. Syntax error near unexpected token "done"-- while read line \- Unix & Linux Stack Exchange, accessed January 26, 2026, [https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/616504/syntax-error-near-unexpected-token-done-while-read-line](https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/616504/syntax-error-near-unexpected-token-done-while-read-line)
11. linux \- syntax error near unexpected token ' \- bash \- Stack Overflow, accessed January 26, 2026, [https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20895946/syntax-error-near-unexpected-token-bash](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20895946/syntax-error-near-unexpected-token-bash)
12. Syntax error near unexpected token 'fi' \- bash \- Stack Overflow, accessed January 26, 2026, [https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20586785/syntax-error-near-unexpected-token-fi](https://stackoverflow.com/questions/20586785/syntax-error-near-unexpected-token-fi)
13. File list command line (hidden and subfolders) \- Ask Ubuntu, accessed January 26, 2026, [https://askubuntu.com/questions/1028197/file-list-command-line-hidden-and-subfolders](https://askubuntu.com/questions/1028197/file-list-command-line-hidden-and-subfolders)
14. How to really clear the terminal? \- Ask Ubuntu, accessed January 26, 2026, [https://askubuntu.com/questions/25077/how-to-really-clear-the-terminal](https://askubuntu.com/questions/25077/how-to-really-clear-the-terminal)
15. Fix terminal after displaying a binary file \- Unix & Linux Stack Exchange, accessed January 26, 2026, [https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/79684/fix-terminal-after-displaying-a-binary-file](https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/79684/fix-terminal-after-displaying-a-binary-file)
16. ruby-build error for v2.7.1 \- GitHub Gist, accessed January 26, 2026, [https://gist.github.com/JAAdrian/baae374cd24be58d4baa620d8dd6e473](https://gist.github.com/JAAdrian/baae374cd24be58d4baa620d8dd6e473)
17. Error with Git Bash (Windows): "syntax error near unexpected token \`x86'" · Issue \#1789 · JanDeDobbeleer/oh-my-posh \- GitHub, accessed January 26, 2026, [https://github.com/JanDeDobbeleer/oh-my-posh/issues/1789](https://github.com/JanDeDobbeleer/oh-my-posh/issues/1789)
18. cat line X to line Y on a huge file \- Unix & Linux Stack Exchange, accessed January 26, 2026, [https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/47407/cat-line-x-to-line-y-on-a-huge-file](https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/47407/cat-line-x-to-line-y-on-a-huge-file)
[image1]: <>
[image2]: <>
[image3]: <>
